Maintaining Biological Records |
|||
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
This issue can be divided into three parts:
All aspects must be addressed if biological records are effectively to be maintained.
The collection of records is carried out by a variety of groups, organisations and individuals. Some records come from organised and systematic survey work while others are submitted when a particular animal or plant is identified in passing. Both organised and casual records are important as both build up our knowledge of the natural environment in the local area.
Much of the collected data are submitted to EcoRecord, however, whilst EcoRecord holds over 250,000 records, there are many records which are not submitted and there is the potential for more data collection. Out of date and incomplete records are also a problem.
A comprehensive and authoritative database is essential in understanding our natural environment and this can only be achieved if the appropriate records are collected and submitted.
Nationally biological and ecological records are maintained by a network of Local Records Centres (LRCs) based on the counties throughout the UK. These may be operated by Local Authorities Planning Departments, Museums or the Wildlife Trust.
These are co-ordinated by the National Biological Records Centre (NBRC) based at the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology's (previously the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology) research station at Monks Wood near Huntingdon.
Over the past few years, since the advent of the Lottery, there has been a project established to produce the 'National Biodiversity Network' (NBN) to increase the communication between LRCs and Monks Wood, and between LRCs themselves. It was hoped to use lottery funding to promote this ideal, but this is still in negotiation.
In Birmingham and the Black Country, biological records are maintained by EcoRecord, the Ecological database for the Black Country and Birmingham. EcoRecord was established in 1991, originally using a grant from English Nature, but is now funded by the five local authorities and operated by the Wildlife Trust and jdt-Mott-MacDonald.
EcoRecord has now developed into one of the foremost LRCs in the country utilising a combination of the English Nature Recorder database and a Geographical Information System (GIS) to store a wide variety of information regarding the regions wildlife resource.
Collecting biological records and entering them onto a database is of little use if no practical use is to be made of them. It is important therefore that the collection of records is geared to meet the needs of the users of the system. The preparation of the Biodiversity Action Plan has introduced a new group of users to EcoRecord whose needs must be accommodated.
![]()
![]()
The establishment and maintenance of EcoRecord as the Biological Records Centre for Birmingham and the Black Country is an important landmark in the nature conservation of the region. However, while EcoRecord is working effectively within the constraints of the resources available to it, there are problems associated with the maintenance of biological records which are briefly described below.
![]()
![]()
National government expects local authorities to 'keep themselves informed of the state of the natural environment locally' (Planning Policy Guidance Note 9: Nature Conservation 1994) and maintaining biological records is central to this requirement. The Local Authorities are not legally obliged to operate an LRC, however, they are legally obliged to supply environmental information - the most cost effective method of maintaining and supplying this information is through an organised LRC. The Data Protection Act informs the ownership of records submitted.
EcoRecord currently employs one member of staff and is controlled by a steering group composed of representatives from the local authorities, operators, English Nature and the voluntary sector. Volunteers are used to enter records.
It is important that EcoRecord is able to meet the needs of the organisations and groups represented on the Steering Group as well as those of other users.
EcoRecord is involved in the NBN's 'Linking Local Records Centres' project to develop standard policies and procedures to benefit Local Record Centres throughout the UK.
![]()
![]()
| OBJECTIVE | TARGET |
|---|---|
|
Ongoing |
|
Ongoing |
|
2001 |
|
Ongoing |
|
2005 |
|
Ongoing |
|
Ongoing |
![]()
![]()
| ACTION | Potential Deliverers |
YEARS | Meets Objective No. | |||||||
| Lead | Partner | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2011 | ||
| 6.1 Policy and legislation | ||||||||||
| Include reference to biological recording requirements within UDPs and/ or other policy documents | LAs | WT | As UDPs and other policy documents are prepared | 2,7 | ||||||
| Include reference to biological recording requirements within LEAPs and/ or other policy documents | EA | LAs, WT | As LEAPs and other policy documents are prepared | 2,7 | ||||||
| Develop standard methodologies for collecting, submitting and maintaining biological records | ER | NBN, EN, WT, LAs | 3,4 | |||||||
| Develop standard procedures and good practice for the running of Local Records Centres | NBN | ER | 3,4 | |||||||
| Seek accreditation of EcoRecord with National Biodiversity Network when the scheme becomes available | (?) | 1,2,3,4 | ||||||||
| Write Development Plan for EcoRecord | WT, LAs | ER | 1-7 | |||||||
| Seek increased funding for EcoRecord | LA, WT | up 50% | 5 | |||||||
| Seek increased staffing for EcoRecord | LA, WT | up 100% | 5 | |||||||
| 6.2 Site / species protection and management | ||||||||||
| Develop improved ways of using EcoRecord to provide information about the local ecological resource | LAs | ALL | Ongoing | 1,3,4,7 | ||||||
| Produce a 'Red Data List' for the region | LAs, ER | WT, EN | 1,3,7 | |||||||
| Produce register of priority habitats/ sites in accordance with criteria developed as part of Species and Habitats Protection Issues Plan | LAs, ER | EN, WT | 1,3,7 | |||||||
| Ensure that records relating to threatened or vulnerable species are kept confidential if the publication of records could threaten such species | ER | LAs, EN, WT, EA | Ongoing | 1,3,7 | ||||||
| 6.3 Advisory | ||||||||||
| Use EcoRecord to inform on the biological resource | ER | ALL | Ongoing | 1,2,3,7 | ||||||
| Use EcoRecord information to monitor planning applications for conflict with nature conservation interests | WT, LA | ER | Ongoing | 1,2,3,7 | ||||||
| Maintain liaison with adjacent biological records centres | ER | Adjacent BRCs | Ongoing | 1,2,3,4,7 | ||||||
| Provide training on the identification and submission of wildlife records for all taxa but especially for 'difficult' taxa | WT, LAs | LCG | 2 | |||||||
| Provide training to the general public on the submission of general wildlife records | 2 | |||||||||
| 6.4 Future research and monitoring | ||||||||||
| Assist in production of Birmingham and Black Country Flora | WT | ER, LCG | 1,3,7 | |||||||
| Identify co-ordinated resurvey work required in the region and work to secure partnerships and resources to carry out and maintain a programme of survey work | LAs | WT, ER | 1,3,7 | |||||||
| Identify poorly covered taxa / areas without up-to-date records to inform survey priorities | LCG | WT, ER | 1,3,7 | |||||||
| Maintain EcoRecord at the forefront of recording including the most advanced recording techniques | LAs | WT, ER | Ongoing | 1-6 | ||||||
| 6.5 Communications and publicity | ||||||||||
| Promote voluntary sector recording | WT, LAs | ER | Ongoing | 2 | ||||||
| Promote increased use of EcoRecord | WT, LAs | ALL | Ongoing | 2 | ||||||
| Produce local atlases of species and habitats | ER | WT, LAs, LCG | 1,3,7 | |||||||
| 6.6 Links to other action plans | ||||||||||
| The implementation of this action plan has links with all Issues, Species and Habitat Action Plans | ||||||||||
![]()
![]()
This Biodiversity Action Plan will be implemented over 10 years with a first review after 5 years. A group will be set up to co-ordinate implementation and to report to the Biodiversity Action Plan Steering Group. This group will meet at a minimum on a yearly basis.
Review will be carried out in conjunction with related Habitat and Species Action Plans as appropriate.
Review will consist of measuring achievement of targets. The group will, with the support of the Steering Group, develop and implement appropriate monitoring methods, which will inform the review process.
The Action Plan will be revised and updated in the light of review results and any relevant changes in circumstances and / or additional information which becomes available during the review period.
In line with national guidance, the Steering Group will report to the UK Biodiversity Steering Group.
Biodiversity Action Plan for Birmingham and the Black Country © 2000
Printing of this publication for educational purposes is permitted, provided that copies are not made or distributed for commercial gain, and the title of the publication and its date appear. To copy otherwise, or to republish, requires specific permission from the Steering Group.