Eutrophic Urban Pools |
|||
| Associated
Species Action Plans
Associated Habitat action plans |
DEFINITIONEutrophic Pools - Two Possible StatesThe phosphorus content, chlorophyll a content and visibility through the water are used in the classification of lake water quality. Mesotrophic lakes are those normally associated with clear water conditions and a good diversity of plant and animal life. Hypertrophic Lakes have high phosphorus levels leading to algal blooms, coloured water and the loss of higher plants. Pools found in urban areas are generally eutrophic; characterised by high nutrient levels, and a consequent lowering of species diversity. Restoring pools to a mesotrophic state may be very difficult. Research indicates that eutrophic lakes may exist in one of two possible states:
or:
The depth of water, extent of surface area and type of construction (steep, shelving, etc) have great bearing on any problems and their possible solutions.
There are 673 Eutrophic Urban Pools of varying sizes recorded in Birmingham and the Black Country. The condition of most of our urban lakes cause complaints about smell, turbidity, algal blooms, and nearby goose droppings. There are indications that, in some, fish stocks are reduced or artificially maintained. Many of these pools are not natural but were built in urban parks, grounds, etc. as attractive features to enhance the formal gardens, trees and lawns. Some were the result of the damming of streams which means that the source of any nutrients continues through continued stream input. They are often subjected to urban run-off from roads and developments, and increased nutrient levels due to wildfowl dropping and food deposited directly into the water. These pools are also the places where most of the nearby litter eventually finishes. Many of these pools are now visually poor, emit odours and support large populations of brown rats. Some contain the bacteria which give rise to botulism and salmonella poisoning. They can, however, have wildlife value, for example, providing valuable feeding habitat for bats. |
![]()
![]()
Chemical and oxygen content of the water is important. High levels of phosphates and/or nitrates can cause algae blooms (including blue green algae, some of which are toxic). Low oxygen levels can cause fish deaths.
Silting up also affects the water quality by holding much of the nutrients within the system. De-silting sometimes has a positive effect on water quality as well as keeping a range of micro habitats in existence at the base of the pond. These micro habitats form refuges for invertebrates which feed on the algae and are also a necessary habitat for species such as crayfish.
High turbidity prevents plants from re-establishing due to lack of light for growth.
Run-off from roads or other civil engineering works can have an adverse affect the quality and quantity of ground water and thus on pools.
Plant life contributes to oxygen levels in water and provide shelter for animals and a base for many aquatic food chains. Problems occur if the plants are over-grazed by waterfowl or uprooted by fish such as carp.
Invertebrates are an integral part of the food web. Carnivores (leech, dragonfly larvae), herbivores (water snails), detritivores (water slaters), and filter feeders (such as Daphnia) all help to make this a potentially rich habitat.
Invertebrates such as Daphnia are an integral part of the aquatic food web. They are not only eaten by many other aquatic creatures but themselves eat algae, thus helping to maintain a clear water environment. Daphnia are found in large numbers sheltering under floating aquatics such as water-lilies.
Carp fishing is a popular sport, but carp can uproot plants whilst feeding. Bream can increase the turbidity of the water (they also tend to be bottom feeders) by causing re-suspension of sediments. This increases the amount of nutrients released into the water. Young bream feed on large amounts of Daphnia, reduction of which can also lead to reduced water clarity. It is also clear that bio-manipulation of fish stocks occurs unofficially.
Birds such as Canada geese have increased dramatically over recent years. They have inefficient digestive systems and large amounts of nutrients, particularly phosphates, enter the water through their droppings. Food left for them by humans also often enters the water directly, rots, and reduces oxygen levels. Canada geese also compete with native wildfowl for nest sites.
The feeding of wildfowl artificially increases the number of birds to a point where they destroy their own habitat. In addition their health can be at risk through inappropriate food stuff as well as from material rotting in the water.
Paddling, swimming and boating also have an affect, albeit a minor one, on sediments by stirring them back into suspension and contributing to further enrichment and the further growth of algae. The excessive feeding of wildfowl also exacerbates any existing problems with brown rats thereby introducing health risks such as that of Weil's Disease.
The trampling of pool edges can also increase erosion.
![]()
![]()
Most urban pools are owned by Local Authorities or other statutory bodies. Many are within formal parks or public open spaces and are suffering from the general malaise affecting such areas. Most of these places have their own Bye Laws, often not stringently applied.
Under the Environment Act, 1995, the Environment Agency have a general duty to promote the conservation of aquatic flora and fauna, so far as they consider it desirable.
Local Authorities and British Waterways also have statutory duties towards nature conservation and some eutrophic urban pools are within SSSIS, SINCS and SLINCS.
All of these bodies have some responsibility for pollution control.
Closer co-operation has been perceived recently between angling groups, nature conservation groups and land (and water) managers. This must be encouraged and built upon.
The Environment Agency, English Nature, Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust, Wandsworth Borough Council and the Game Conservancy have carried out research and published much research and advisory material.
![]()
![]()
| OBJECTIVE | ACTION / TARGET |
|---|---|
|
Ongoing |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2006 |
|
2011 |
|
2006 |
![]()
![]()
| ACTION | Potential Deliverers |
YEARS | Meets Objective No. |
|||||||
| Lead | Partner | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2011 | ||
| 5.1 Policy and legislation | ||||||||||
| Seek the inclusion of effective measures which protect eutrophic urban pools in the preparation of Unitary Development Plans, Local Environment Agency Plans and/or other policy documents. | LAs, EA | WT / EN | As UDPs, LEAPs and other policy documents are prepared. | 1, 5 | ||||||
| Ensure that appropriate policy is included in all Parks and Greenspace Reviews | LAs | WT | 1,5 | |||||||
| Produce Best Practice Guidance Document | WT, LAs | EA, STW | 4 | |||||||
| Set up a "Still Water Managment Group". | WT, LAs | Angling Clubs | 3 | |||||||
| 5.2 Site and species afeguard and management | ||||||||||
| Identify sites of particular value for biodiversity | WT | LO | 1,5 | |||||||
| Identify sites in need of urgent management and introduce managment and monitoring. | WT | LO, LAs, EA | 1,5,6 | |||||||
| Identify presence of important species | WT | LO | 5 | |||||||
| Draw up management plans where appropriate | WT | EA, LAs, LO | 5 | |||||||
| Identify funding sources for pool management | WT | EA, LAs | 4 | |||||||
| 5.3 Advisory | ||||||||||
| Draw up best practice guidelines and promote these to landowners and pool managers | WT | 5 | ||||||||
| 5.4 Future research and monitoring | ||||||||||
| Continue existing Canada goose monitoring | LAs, WMBC | ER, WT | 1, 7 | |||||||
| Introduce recording methods for fish catches | LO | ER | 6 | |||||||
| 5.5 Communications and publicity | ||||||||||
| Prepare Advisory Booklet for schools | WT | 7 | ||||||||
| Interpretation at all appropriate pools | LA, EA | WT | 7 | |||||||
| 5.6 Links to other action plans | ||||||||||
| Canals, garden ponds, gardens, allotments, parks and public open space, rivers and streams | ||||||||||
![]()
![]()
This Biodiversity Action Plan will be implemented over 10 years with a first review after 5 years. A group will be set up to co-ordinate implementation and to report to the Biodiversity Action Plan Steering Group. This group will meet at a minimum on a yearly basis.
Review will be carried out in conjunction with related Habitat and Species Action Plans as appropriate.
Review will consist of measuring achievement of targets. The group will, with the support of the Steering Group, develop and implement appropriate monitoring methods, which will inform the review process.
The Action Plan will be revised and updated in the light of review results and any relevant changes in circumstances and / or additional information which becomes available during the review period.
In line with national guidance, the Steering Group will report to the UK Biodiversity Steering Group.
![]()
![]()
ARC and the Game Conservancy - "Wildlife after Gravel".
Wandsworth Borough Council - London Lakes Project.
Biodiversity Action Plan for Birmingham and the Black Country © 2000
Printing of this publication for educational purposes is permitted, provided that copies are not made or distributed for commercial gain, and the title of the publication and its date appear. To copy otherwise, or to republish, requires specific permission from the Steering Group.