Wall Butterfly (Lasiommata megera) |
|||
| Associated
Species Action Plans
Associated Habitat action plans Gardens, allotments, parks and open space Grasslands |
Formerly a widespread and common species to be expected in a wide range of grassland habitats but now an increasingly scarce butterfly throughout the region which appears to be undergoing significant decline. There are no signs of recovery and there is a growing list of sites from which this species has been lost. This species is known to have experienced several expansions and contractions since recording began. In the 1860s a series of cold wet summers is believed to have been the factor behind a marked decline while, more recently, some apparent expansion of range in the 1970s was followed by dramatic declines from the mid-80s onwards. While there have been some signs of more recent recovery in parts of southern Britain, this has not been the case within the West Midlands region. The butterfly has sharply declined within Gloucestershire, where it used to be a common roadside verge species, and it is on the verge of extinction in Worcestershire, where it has only recently been recorded on the Malvern Hills. In Herefordshire, Warwickshire, the West Midlands county, Staffordshire and Shropshire, the species has fared slightly better but even here there is evidence of rapid decline. In Birmingham and the Black Country, the species is strongly associated with old industrial sites and canal towpaths and, while the species is probably still under-recorded within the area, there is clear evidence of decline. Historically, the butterfly was fairly widespread, occurring in all LA areas, but most of the records held on EcoRecord now date back to the eighties and there are relatively few post 1990 records. A similar picture emerges from Butterfly Conservation's Provisional Atlas of the Butterflies of the West Midlands covering the years 1995-98 with, regionally, wall brown reported from less than 200 of the 2,374 tetrads so far recorded. Nationally, declines have been reported from most of inland lowland Britain with coastal areas now being the stronghold for this species. |
![]()
![]()
The reason for declines are not clearly understood and numbers have fallen on both managed and unmanaged sites. Probable factors within Birmingham and the Black Country include:
![]()
![]()
None
Survey work is urgently required to establish the current distribution and status of the wall brown within Birmingham and the Black Country. Casual records submitted to EcoRecord and Butterfly Conservation suggest a major decline (West Midlands Butterfly Conservation 1998). Regionally at 10km square level, the wall brown shows a 38% decline over the past 17 years (Joy, J. 1997); at tetrad level this decline is likely to be considerably greater. Regionally, only brown hairstreak, pearl-bordered fritillary, high brown fritillary and marsh fritillary show higher rates of decline over the same period. Formerly recorded on 20 transects in the region, in 1998 it was only recorded on three and, in each case, the population index for the year was in single figures.
No in depth ecological studies have yet been carried out on the wall brown but the species favours areas of dry, unfertilised grassland with ideally bare patches where the butterfly likes to bask. Eggs are laid on various species of grasses but particularly cock's-foot, wavy hair-grass and common bent. The aspect of the foodplant, however, is probably more important than the actual species of grass as the wall favours grasses where the adjacent ground has broken away to leave the tuft of grass exposed such as within a depression caused by animal hoofprints or rabbit grazing, or along a crumbling bank (Dennis, R. 1983).
![]()
![]()
| OBJECTIVE | TARGET |
|---|---|
|
By 2002 |
|
By 2003 |
|
Ongoing |
|
Ongoing |
|
By 2006 |
![]()
![]()
| ACTION | Potential Deliverers |
YEARS | Meets Objective No. | |||||||
| Lead | Partner | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2011 | ||
| 5.1 Policy and legislation | ||||||||||
| Seek the inclusion of effective measures which protect wall butterflies and their habitats in the preparation of Unitary Development Plans and/ or other policy documents. | LAs | WT, BC | As UDPs and other policy documents are prepared | 4 | ||||||
| 5.2 Site/species safeguard and management | ||||||||||
| Protect all surviving wall butterfly colonies | LAs, LO | EN, WT, BC | 4 | |||||||
| Seek opportunities to extend suitable breeding areas within or adjacent to existing habitat | BC | EN, LAs, WT | 4 | |||||||
| Ensure sites with wall butterflies have adequate protection and management plans which uses best practice for wall butterfly conservation | LAs, EN | WT, BC, LO | 4 | |||||||
| 5.3 Advisory | ||||||||||
| Disseminate information to landowners to introduce specific management for wall butterflies | BC, EN | WT, FWAG | 3,4 | |||||||
| Promote best practice guidelines for wall butterflies | BC | EN, WT, LAs, FWAG | 3,4 | |||||||
| 5.4 Future research and monitoring | ||||||||||
| Undertake survey of sites with wall records to determine current status | BC | WT, LAs, LO | 1,2 | |||||||
| Establish monitoring at key sites to determine any change in status | BC | WT, LAs, LO | 2 | |||||||
| Promote and support research aimed at measures to assist long term species conservation | BC | EN, WT, LAs | 5 | |||||||
| 5.5 Communications and publicity | ||||||||||
| Raise awareness of the decline of wall butterflies and its importance in conservation management | BC | ALL | 3,4 | |||||||
| 5.6 Links to other action plans | ||||||||||
| Grasslands (all types); urban 'wasteland'; gardens, allotments, parks and open space; canals | ||||||||||
![]()
![]()
This Biodiversity Action Plan will be implemented over 10 years with a first review after 5 years. The Butterfly Conservation Group, West Midlands Branch, will co-ordinate implementation and monitoring of the Action Plan and report to the Biodiversity Action Plan Steering Group. This group will meet at a minimum on a yearly basis, for this purpose.
Review will be carried out in conjunction with related Habitat and Species Action Plans as appropriate and will consist of measuring achievement of targets. The group will, with the support of the Steering Group, develop and implement appropriate monitoring methods, which will inform the review process.
The Action Plan will be revised and updated in the light of review results and any relevant changes in circumstances and / or additional information which becomes available during the review period.
In line with national guidance, the Steering Group will report to the UK Biodiversity Steering Group.
![]()
![]()
Dennis, R (1983) Egg-laying cues in the wall brown butterfly Lasiommata megera (L.) Entomologist's Gazette 34: 89-95
Joy, J. (1997) West Midlands Regional Action Plan West Midlands Butterfly Conservation
West Midlands Butterfly Conservation (1998) A provisional Atlas for Butterflies of the West Midlands 1995-98 West Midlands Butterfly Conservation
Biodiversity Action Plan for Birmingham and the Black Country © 2000
Printing of this publication for educational purposes is permitted, provided that copies are not made or distributed for commercial gain, and the title of the publication and its date appear. To copy otherwise, or to republish, requires specific permission from the Steering Group.